Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Next Step
So I was reading the latest on Ultimate talk today and checked out this post. The quick summary is that it just talks about how Ultimate strategy is underdeveloped, blah, blha, blah, lets make cutting and offense better, yada, yada, yada. Well I kinda started thinking about it and it just makes sense that offensive strategy isn't progressing a ton becaues there is this overriding theme in Ultimate that a great O-line is going to score all its goals and there is nothing you can do about it. Basically, why should offenses get better if defenses don't. Right now the sport's offensive strategy (when executed properly) can score all the O-points. At least this is the premise I'm operating this all under. Problem is, defense seems to not really care cuz their teams O-line can do the same. I can't even count how many times I've heard people say: "As long as the O-line takes care of business and we toss in a few here and there, we got this one easy." And right now, its true. But people can't ask for more strategy until the defenses make the move and I think I have an idea what the next step is: defensive adjustments during stall counts to take advantage of players limiting their options. I intentionally made that sound like semi-crazy talk cuz this is public and I ain't having no fuckers hear this shit before you guys all do (it probably isn't that innovative, but I think it could help us if done right). IM me sometime and I'll send you my idea. TallE already kinda heard it. It's all still in development - gotta watch more basketball.
Comments:
<< Home
speaking of o and d
check out this post from the stanford coach, evan i think?
click here
im browsing around procrastinating here, but i think he brings up an interesting o vs. d player split dilemma that we are dealing with.
Post a Comment
check out this post from the stanford coach, evan i think?
click here
im browsing around procrastinating here, but i think he brings up an interesting o vs. d player split dilemma that we are dealing with.
<< Home
